journal of biomedical informatics
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Ethical Considerations in Biomedical Informatics: Balancing Innovation and Privacy

Amanda Lewis*
 
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, USA, Email: alewis@biomedical.stanford.edu
 
*Correspondence: Amanda Lewis, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, USA, Email: alewis@biomedical.stanford.edu

Published: 06-Dec-2024, DOI: 10.24105/ejbi.2024. 20(4): 282-283

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact submissions@ejbi.org

European Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

  

Introduction

Biomedical informatics is at the forefront of transforming healthcare through the use of cutting-edge technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and big data analytics [1]. This field promises significant innovations, including personalized medicine, predictive analytics, and more efficient healthcare delivery systems. However, these advancements come with ethical challenges, particularly concerning the balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding privacy [2].

The potential of biomedical informatics lies in its ability to analyze vast amounts of health-related data to derive insights that can revolutionize patient care [3]. For instance, predictive models can identify individuals at risk of developing chronic diseases, enabling early intervention. Personalized treatment plans based on genetic information can enhance therapeutic outcomes. Additionally, population health studies can uncover patterns that inform public health strategies [4].

Despite these benefits, the data-driven nature of biomedical informatics raises significant ethical concerns. At the core of these concerns are issues related to patient privacy, data security, and informed consent [5].

One of the primary ethical challenges in biomedical informatics is ensuring the privacy of individuals whose data is being collected, stored, and analyzed. Health data is highly sensitive, and unauthorized access or misuse can have severe consequences, including discrimination, stigmatization, and psychological harm [6].

De-identification of data—the process of removing personally identifiable information (PII)—is commonly employed to mitigate privacy risks. However, advancements in data analytics and re-identification techniques have shown that even anonymized data can sometimes be traced back to individuals [7]. For example, combining data from multiple sources can create a comprehensive profile that reveals sensitive information about a person [8].

Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical biomedical research. However, the complexity of data usage in biomedical informatics makes it challenging to obtain truly informed consent. Patients often struggle to understand how their data will be used, who will have access to it, and the potential risks involved. Furthermore, secondary uses of data—such as for AI training or commercial purposes—may not always align with the original consent provided by the individual.

Dynamic consent models, which allow patients to provide ongoing input and preferences about how their data is used, have been proposed as a potential solution. While this approach empowers patients, it also introduces logistical challenges and increases the administrative burden on healthcare organizations.

Balancing innovation with privacy requires a multifaceted approach. First, robust data governance frameworks are essential. These frameworks should outline clear guidelines for data collection, storage, sharing, and usage, ensuring compliance with regulations like the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) or the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [9].

Second, implementing advanced security measures is crucial. Techniques like encryption, blockchain, and federated learning can enhance data protection while enabling collaborative research. Federated learning, for instance, allows AI models to be trained across multiple datasets without transferring sensitive data, reducing privacy risks.

Third, fostering transparency and trust is vital. Researchers and healthcare organizations must clearly communicate their intentions and the benefits of data sharing while addressing patient concerns. Public engagement and education initiatives can help build trust and promote ethical practices.

Ethical frameworks tailored to biomedical informatics can guide researchers and practitioners in navigating complex issues. Principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice should underpin all activities. Additionally, independent ethics boards and oversight committees can ensure accountability and adherence to ethical standards [10].

Conclusion

Biomedical informatics holds immense potential to improve healthcare, but its success depends on addressing the ethical challenges it faces. Striking a balance between innovation and privacy requires collaboration among technologists, healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients. By fostering a culture of transparency, trust, and accountability, the field can ensure that technological advancements benefit society without compromising individual rights.

References

  1. Reeves JJ, Hollandsworth HM, Torriani FJ, et al. Rapid response to COVID-19: health informatics support for outbreak management in an academic health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (6): 853–9.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Azzopardi-Muscat N, Kluge HHP, Asma S, et al. A call to strengthen data in response to COVID-19 and beyond. J Am Med Inform As soc 2021; 28 (3): 638–9.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Ferguson JM, Jacobs J, Yefimova M, et al. Virtual care expansion in the Veterans Health Administration during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical services and patient characteristics associated with utilization. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (3): 453–62.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Jalali MS, Landman A, Gordon WJ.. Telemedicine, privacy, and information security in the age of COVID-19. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (3): 671–2.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Haendel MA, Chute CG, Bennett TD, et al. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (3): 427–43.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Hassandoust F, Akhaghpour S, Johnson AC.. Individuals’ privacy concerns and adoption of contact tracing mobile applications in a pandemic: a situational privacy calculus perspective. JAm Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (3): 463–71.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Oiao Z, Bae A, Glass LM, et al. FLANNEL Focal Loss bAsed Neural Network EnsembLe for COVID-19 detection. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (3): 444–52.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Gao X, Dong Q.. A Bayesian framework for estimating the risk ratio of hospitalization for people with comorbidity infected by SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (3): 472–6.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Steckler TJ, Brownlee MJ, Urick BY, et al. Pharmacy informatics: A call to action for educators, administrators, and residency directors. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2017;9:746–9.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Kennedy MA, Moen A. Nurse leadership and informatics competencies: shaping transformation of professional practice. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017;232:197–206.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar