journal of biomedical informatics
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Navigating the Terrain of Health Data Governance: Ensuring Privacy, Security, and Ethical Use

Eufemia Bortoli*
 
Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Agder, Norway, Email: eufemia@uia.no
 
*Correspondence: Eufemia Bortoli, Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Agder, Norway, Email: eufemia@uia.no

Received: 04-Mar-2024 Published: 30-Apr-2024

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact submissions@ejbi.org

European Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Introduction

In today's digital age, health data has become a cornerstone of modern healthcare systems. From Electronic Health Records (EHR) to wearable devices and genomic sequencing, the volume and diversity of health-related data have skyrocketed. This wealth of information hold immense potential for advancing medical research, improving patient care, and optimizing healthcare delivery. However, it also brings forth significant challenges, particularly in terms of privacy, security, and ethical use. In response to these challenges, the concept of health data governance has emerged as a critical framework for guiding the responsible management and utilization of health data [1].

Health data governance encompasses a set of policies, processes, and controls designed to ensure the appropriate collection, storage, sharing, and analysis of health-related information while safeguarding individual privacy, maintaining data integrity, and upholding ethical principles. At its core, health data governance seeks to strike a delicate balance between harnessing the transformative power of data-driven technologies and safeguarding the rights and interests of patients and individuals [2, 3].

Central to effective health data governance is the establishment of clear policies and guidelines governing the collection, access, and use of health data. These policies should address key considerations such as data ownership, consent mechanisms, data security protocols, and data sharing agreements. By defining roles, responsibilities, and accountability mechanisms, organizations can create a framework that promotes transparency, accountability, and compliance with regulatory requirements such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States or the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union [4, 5].

One of the foundational principles of health data governance is the protection of individual privacy. Healthcare organizations must implement robust measures to anonymize, pseudonymize, or de-identify health data to prevent unauthorized access or disclosure of sensitive information. Encryption, access controls, and data masking techniques are commonly employed to mitigate privacy risks and ensure that only authorized personnel have access to identifiable health information.

Moreover, health data governance extends beyond technical safeguards to encompass ethical considerations surrounding data use and sharing. It is essential to adhere to ethical principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice when handling health data. Researchers and healthcare providers must obtain informed consent from patients before collecting or using their data for research or clinical purposes. Additionally, data sharing practices should prioritize data utility while minimizing potential harms and ensuring equitable access to data resources [6, 7].

In the context of precision medicine and biomedical research, health data governance plays a pivotal role in facilitating data sharing and collaboration across disparate stakeholders. Data interoperability standards and frameworks enable seamless exchange of health information between healthcare systems, research institutions, and regulatory agencies, fostering innovation and accelerating scientific discoveries. However, interoperability efforts must also address interoperability challenges such as semantic heterogeneity, data integration issues, and governance gaps to realize the full potential of data-driven healthcare. [8, 9].

Furthermore, health data governance extends beyond the confines of organizational boundaries to encompass broader societal implications. As data-driven technologies continue to reshape the healthcare landscape, it is imperative to address issues of data equity, algorithmic bias, and digital divide to ensure that vulnerable populations are not marginalized or excluded from the benefits of health data-driven innovations. Stakeholder engagement, community involvement, and participatory approaches are essential for fostering trust, promoting health equity, and empowering individuals to exercise control over their health data [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, health data governance is a multifaceted endeavor that requires a holistic approach encompassing legal, ethical, technical, and social dimensions. By establishing robust governance frameworks, healthcare organizations can navigate the complex landscape of health data management while upholding individual rights, promoting data privacy, and fostering trust in data-driven healthcare systems. Ultimately, effective health data governance is essential for realizing the full potential of health data to improve patient outcomes, advance medical knowledge, and transform healthcare delivery in the 21st century.

References

  1. Baun DL, Christensen TH (2004) Speciation of heavy metals in landfill leachate: a review. Waste Management and Research 22: 3-23.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. de Bok F, Stams A, Dijkema C, Boone CD (2001) Diversity of Cellulolytic Bacteria in Landfill. J Appl Bacteriol 79: 73-78.

    3. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Ferronata N, Torretta V (2019) Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues. Int J Environ Res & Rublic Health 2019.

    4. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Dobbin NA, Sun L, Wallace L, Kulka R, You H, et al. (2018) The benefit of kitchen exhaust fan use after cooking - An experimental assessment. Build Environ 135: 286-296.

    5. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Kang K, Kim H, Kim DD, Lee YG, Kim T (2019) Characteristics of cooking-generated PM10 and PM2.5 in residential buildings with different cooking and ventilation types. Sci Total Environ 668: 56-66.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Sun L, Wallace LA, Dobbin NA, You H, Kulka R, et al. (2018) Effect of venting range hood flow rate on size-resolved ultrafine particle concentrations from gas stove cooking. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 52: 1370-1381.

    7. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Rim D, Wallace LA, Nabinger S, Persily A (2012) Reduction of exposure to ultrafine particles by kitchen exhaust hoods: The effects of exhaust flow rates, particle size, and burner position. Sci Total Environ. 432: 350-56.

    8. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Singer BC, Pass RZ, Delp WW, Lorenzetti DM, Maddalena RL (2017) Pollutant concentrations and emission rates from natural gas cooking burners without and with range hood exhaust in nine California homes. Build Environ. 43: 3235-3242.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Li M, Fang C, Kawasaki S, Achal V (2018) Fly ash incorporated with biocement to improve strength of expansive soil. Sci Rep; 8:2565.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Choi S-G, Wang K, Chu J (2016) Properties of biocemented, fiber reinforced sand. Constr Build Mater; 120:623-629.

    11. Google Scholar, Cross Ref