journal of biomedical informatics
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Satoshi Mori*
 
Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Tokyo, Japan, Email: smori@biomedical.tokyo.jp
 
*Correspondence: Satoshi Mori, Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Tokyo, Japan, Email: smori@biomedical.tokyo.jp

Published: 04-Dec-2024, DOI: 10.24105/ejbi.2024. 20(4): 278-279

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact submissions@ejbi.org

Abstract

  

Introduction

Electronic health records (EHRs) play a pivotal role in enhancing patient-centered care, a healthcare approach that emphasizes individualized, comprehensive, and coordinated treatment [1]. By leveraging digital technologies, EHRs foster improved communication, collaboration, and data-driven decision-making, ultimately improving health outcomes and patient satisfaction [2].

EHRs consolidate a patient’s medical history, diagnostic tests, treatments, and medications into a single digital repository. This centralized system enables healthcare providers to access up-to-date and comprehensive information, reducing errors associated with incomplete or fragmented data [3]. For instance, during emergencies, EHRs allow quick retrieval of critical information, such as allergies or chronic conditions, enabling timely and accurate interventions. This accessibility supports informed decision-making and enhances the quality of care [4].

Continuity of care is a cornerstone of patient-centered care, and EHRs serve as a bridge across various care settings. By enabling seamless sharing of information among primary care providers, specialists, and other healthcare entities, EHRs ensure that all involved parties have a consistent understanding of a patient’s health status [5]. This reduces redundant testing and minimizes delays in treatment. For example, when a patient transitions from a hospital to a rehabilitation facility, EHRs can transfer discharge summaries and care plans, promoting coordinated care [6].

EHR systems often include patient portals that empower individuals to play an active role in their healthcare. These portals allow patients to schedule appointments, view test results, request prescription refills, and communicate securely with their providers [7]. Such transparency fosters trust and encourages patients to adhere to treatment plans. Additionally, EHRs support shared decision-making by providing tools to present health data in an easily understandable format, enabling patients to make informed choices about their care [8].

EHRs contribute significantly to patient safety by integrating clinical decision support systems (CDSS). These tools provide alerts for potential drug interactions, flag abnormal lab results, and suggest evidence-based treatment options. By reducing the likelihood of medication errors and other adverse events, EHRs ensure safer patient care. Furthermore, standardized documentation in EHRs minimizes miscommunication and enhances the clarity of medical records [9].

Beyond individual patient care, EHRs support population health management by enabling the aggregation and analysis of health data. Healthcare organizations can identify trends, track disease outbreaks, and implement preventive measures more effectively. For example, EHRs can help identify patients at high risk for conditions like diabetes or hypertension, prompting targeted interventions. This proactive approach aligns with the principles of patient-centered care by addressing health concerns before they escalate.

Despite their advantages, the implementation of EHRs is not without challenges. Concerns about data security and patient privacy must be addressed to maintain trust. Additionally, the learning curve associated with EHR systems can lead to initial inefficiencies and provider burnout. To maximize their potential, ongoing training, robust cybersecurity measures, and user-friendly designs are essential [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, EHRs are a cornerstone of modern, patient-centered healthcare. By enhancing access to information, facilitating continuity of care, engaging patients, reducing errors, and supporting population health initiatives, EHRs empower providers to deliver higher-quality, individualized care. Addressing their challenges will further strengthen their impact, ensuring they continue to transform healthcare delivery for the better.

References

  1. Gore A, Chavan P, Kadam Y, Dhumale G. Application of Biostatistics in Research by Teaching Faculty and Final-Year Postgraduate Students in Colleges of Modern Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012;2(1):11.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Weissgerber TL, Garovic VD, Milin-Lazovic JS, Winham SJ, Obradovic Z, Trzeciakowski JP, et al. Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(4).
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Appleton DDR. What Statistics Should we Teach Medical Undergraduates and Graduates?. Stat Med. 1990; 9(9):1013-1021.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Durning SJ. Second-Year Medical Students Motivational Beliefs, Emotions, and Achievement. Med Educ. 2010; 44(12):1203-1212.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Zhang Y, Shang L, Wang R, Zhao Q, Li C, Xu Y, et al. Attitudes toward Statistics in Medical Postgraduates: Measuring, Evaluating and Monitoring. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12(1).
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Anderson M, Anderson S L. How should AI Be developed,validated and implemented in patient care? AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(02):125–30.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  13. Rothstein M A, Tovino S A. California Takes the Lead on Data Privacy Law. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019;49(05):4–5.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Lehmann C U, Petersen C, Bhatia H, Berner E S, Goodman K W. Advance Directives and Code Status Information Exchange: A Consensus Proposal for a Minimum Set of Attributes. Cambridge Q Healthc ethics. 2019;28(01):178–85.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Maher N A, Senders J T, Hulsbergen A FC, Lamba N, Parker M, Onnela J P et al.Passive data collection and use in healthcare: A systematic review of ethical issues. Int J Med Inform. 2019;129:242–7.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Beier K, Schweda M, Schicktanz S. Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(01):90.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref